<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Utah Law Talk &#187; Dog Bites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.utahlawtalk.com/category/dog-bites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.utahlawtalk.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Young Boy Attacked by a Pit Bull in West Valley Dog Bite</title>
		<link>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/10/young-boy-attacked-by-a-pit-bull-in-west-valley-dog-bite.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/10/young-boy-attacked-by-a-pit-bull-in-west-valley-dog-bite.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronkramerlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dog Bites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utahlawtalk.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pit bull attacked a 5-year-old boy in West Valley City, Utah on Friday, October 23, 2009. The child was taken to the hospital with head injuries. Police say the dog bit the boy’s face during an Utah dog bite attack on the street near 3000 South and Rae Street. According to KSL, the boy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pit bull attacked a 5-year-old boy in West Valley City, Utah on Friday, October 23, 2009. The child was taken to the hospital with head injuries. Police say the dog bit the boy’s face during an Utah dog bite attack on the street near 3000 South and Rae Street. According to <a href="http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&amp;sid=8425030">KSL</a>, the boy lives across the street from the dog owner. The owner was contacted and said he was not home at the time of the attack, but claims the dog was leashed and in a kennel behind some fences.</p>
<p>The dog’s owner said his roommate witnessed the boy harassing the dog but did not see the attack. Our prayers go out to this little boy for a speedy recovery.</p>
<p style="margin: 0;padding: 0;border: 0">
<p style="margin: 0;padding: 0;border: 0;vertical-align: baseline;font-size: .75em;text-align: center;width: 424px">Video Courtesy of <a href="http://www.ksl.com">KSL.com</a></p>
<p>Under Utah law, dog owners, or those that keep dogs, are &#8220;strictly liable&#8221; for the injuries that their dogs cause. The only limit is if the victim helped contribute to those injuries by teasing or otherwise provoking the dog. In this case, the victim is a 5-year old who is does not think like an adult or teenager might. They are unable to appreciate the possible repercussions of bothering a dog. This is why the prevailing view under Utah law is that a child under the age of seven is conclusively presumed to not be guilty of contributory negligence.</p>
<p>The next issue is insurance. Generally speaking, most renters do not carry insurance to cover this type of claim. Homeowners, on the other hand, do. I would therefore recommend that the parents of this boy contact a <a href="http://ronkramerlaw.com/dog-bites/">Utah dog bite lawyer</a> to find out what insurance remedies are available to help their son in his recovery and down the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/10/young-boy-attacked-by-a-pit-bull-in-west-valley-dog-bite.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4-year-old Girl Bit by a Pit Bull in Kearns</title>
		<link>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/04/4-year-old-girl-bit-by-a-pit-bull-in-kearns.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/04/4-year-old-girl-bit-by-a-pit-bull-in-kearns.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronkramerlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dog Bites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpartners.info/utl/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 4-year old girl was walking past a home with two adults when a pit bull attacked her near 4100 West and 500 South on Monday afternoon. The dog came out from behind the bushes and the adults tried to protect the 4-year old but the dog latched on to the girls leg.
The pit bull’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 4-year old girl was walking past a home with two adults when a <a href="http://www.ronkramerlaw.com/dog-bites.php">pit bull attacked </a>her near 4100 West and 500 South on Monday afternoon. The dog came out from behind the bushes and the adults tried to protect the 4-year old but the dog latched on to the girls leg.</p>
<p>The pit bull’s owner came outside and got the dog away from the girl. She was taken to the hospital with a large wound on her upper thigh. She is still recovering from injuries but fortunately the injuries were night life threatening.  The Salt Lake County Sheriff’s Office and animal control officers gave the dog owner several options as to what could be done with the pit bull. The owner chose to have his dog euthanized reports KSL news.</p>
<p>Legally speaking, the victim in this story has a claim against the owner of the dog that bit her.<br />According to Utah state law, no warning or “violent propensities” are needed since the law imposes “strict liability” on the dog’s owner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/04/4-year-old-girl-bit-by-a-pit-bull-in-kearns.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dog Bite Takes Off Woman’s Finger Tip in Kearns</title>
		<link>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/02/dog-bite-takes-off-woman%e2%80%99s-finger-tip-in-kearns.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/02/dog-bite-takes-off-woman%e2%80%99s-finger-tip-in-kearns.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronkramerlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dog Bites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpartners.info/utl/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two Bull Mastiffs broke through a fence in a neighborhood in Kearns, Utah on February 26, 2009, and bit a woman’s finger off at about the last knuckle. It happened at 6085 South 5185 West. According to KSL News, the woman was trying to repair her fence when the dog attack happened. The dogs were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two <a href="http://www.bullmastiffinfo.org/">Bull Mastiffs </a>broke through a fence in a neighborhood in Kearns, Utah on February 26, 2009, and bit a woman’s finger off at about the last knuckle. It happened at 6085 South 5185 West. According to KSL News, the woman was trying to repair her fence when the dog attack happened. The dogs were apparently already in her yard. Both had gotten through the wood-slat fence dividing the two properties. The victim’s grandson reports that they had problems with the two dogs going back two years. Officials from the <a href="http://www.animalservices.slco.org/">Salt Lake County Animal Services </a>say that is unsual. The woman was taken to the hospital for treatment. Salt Lake County Animal Control officers located the fingertip and sent it off to the hospital with the hopes that doctors are able to reattach it. Meanwhile, the dogs are in quarantine until officials determine if they have rabies and if they are still a threat.<br />Legally speaking, the victim in this story has a claim against the owner of the dog that bit her. It doesn’t matter that the dog has been bothering her family for two years or that the bite came out-of-the-blue. No warning or “violent propensities” are needed in Utah since the law imposes “<a href="http://ronkramerlaw.com/dog-bites.php">strict liability” on the dog’s owner</a>.<br />I actually had a case almost identical to this one, where the tip of my client’s finger was bit right off his hand. Unfortunately, he never located the finger tip and now has a finger shorter than the other. In these kind of cases, the victim will want to get the name of the dog owner’s home insurance, assuming the dog owner has some. There is usually coverage for at least $100,000 for personal injury claims. In this dog bite case, I would recommend that the woman contact an attorney who has experience in dog bite cases to find out what her rights and potential remedies are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/02/dog-bite-takes-off-woman%e2%80%99s-finger-tip-in-kearns.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woman Calls for Ban on Pit Bulls After Violent Dog Attack</title>
		<link>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/02/woman-calls-for-ban-on-pit-bulls-after-violent-dog-attack.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/02/woman-calls-for-ban-on-pit-bulls-after-violent-dog-attack.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronkramerlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Childrens Injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dog Bites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpartners.info/utl/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A woman walking her dog this past Saturday, February 7, 2009, in Salt Lake City, Utah, was outraged when two loose pit bulls attacked her sheepdog. According to KSL News, the woman, Kim Cawdery, had let her dog run free in Herman Franks Park when two pit bulls jumped it, viciously biting and mauling it. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A woman walking her dog this past Saturday, February 7, 2009, in Salt Lake City, Utah, was outraged when two loose pit bulls attacked her sheepdog. According to K<a href="http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&amp;sid=5552760">SL News</a>, the woman, Kim Cawdery, had let her dog run free in Herman Franks Park when two pit bulls jumped it, viciously biting and mauling it. Following the attack, she brought her wounded dog to local animal hospital, where they performed surgery to treat the severe wounds the dog had received. The owner of the bit bulls received a citation.</p>
<p style="border: 0pt none ; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; outline-color: -moz-use-text-color; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0pt;" id="kslvid5552760">
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://pandora.bonnint.net/video/embed-p.php?id=5552760"></script>
<p style="border: 0pt none ; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; outline-color: -moz-use-text-color; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0pt; vertical-align: baseline; font-size: 0.75em; text-align: center; width: 424px;">Video Courtesy of <a href="http://www.ksl.com/">KSL.com</a></p>
<p>Now Cawdery is launching a flyer campaign to raise awareness of the issue and is calling for a complete ban on pit bull dogs in Salt Lake City. On the flyer she is circulating, she is including before and after pictures of her dog, which are pretty gruesome. She told the media: “Hopefully, Coco got hurt for a reason, and that we can prevent a child getting hurt.”</p>
<p>Her proposal to ban pit bulls to reduce the incidence of dog bites of children in Salt Lake City is not without criticism. Representatives of the Utah Animal Adoption Center say that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_bull">pit bull dogs</a> are no more likely to attack than other breed of dogs and that many pit bull dogs are actually quite docile and good with kids. The representative did admit that pit bulls have stronger jaws and are more tenacious when they attack. She added that while not all pit bulls are dangerous, their owners should not let a pit bull – or any dog for that matter – roam free in an off-leash park if their dog has kind of vicious propensity.</p>
<p>In Utah, there is strict liability on the part of dog owners when their dog bites or attacks a person, or because of the dog’s menacing nature, causes someone to become injured in trying to get away from a threatening dog. In Utah, it isn’t even necessary that the dog owner have notice that their dog might bite, as is the case in other states where they have a “one free bite” rule.</p>
<p>In the meantime, parents of young children may wish to think twice about visiting Herman Franks Park, located near 700 East and 1300 South in Salt Lake, with their children since it is almost impossible to know when a dog is going to decide to attack or bite.</p>
<p>The author, Ron Kramer, is a personal injury attorney practicing in Salt Lake, Davis and Utah Counties.</p>
<p>Published by: Ron Kramer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/02/woman-calls-for-ban-on-pit-bulls-after-violent-dog-attack.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spanish Fork Car Accident Claims Life of 21-Year Old</title>
		<link>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/01/spanish-fork-car-accident-claims-life-of-21-year-old.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/01/spanish-fork-car-accident-claims-life-of-21-year-old.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronkramerlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dog Bites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trucking Accident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicle Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text messaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpartners.info/utl/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man is dead after losing control on an icy patch of I-15 in Spanish Fork. According to KSL News, the man, 21 year old Bryce Christensen, was traveling north on I-15 on January 7, 2009 around 8 a.m. when the back of his Toyota RAV4 was struck by a Ford SUV. The driver of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A man is dead after losing control on an icy patch of I-15 in Spanish Fork. According to KSL News, the man, 21 year old Bryce Christensen, was traveling north on I-15 on January 7, 2009 around 8 a.m. when the back of his Toyota RAV4 was struck by a Ford SUV. The driver of the Ford had actually lost control of his or her vehicle after hitting a patch of ice. This all happened when the Ford driver was attempting to merge onto northbound I-15 from Route 6. After the impact occurred, Christensen’s vehicle careened into the median wall and bounced back into the main lanes of travel to be then broadsided by a semi truck. Bryce Christensen was taken to Utah Valley Regional Medical Center, but unfortunately, died a few hours later. A citation is pending against the driver of the Ford.</p>
<p>My condolences to the family of this man. It sounds like he was driving prudently in one of the right lanes when this all happened. From the facts of the story, I can’t see that Mr. Christensen contributed in anyway to the <a href="http://ronkramerlaw.com/vehicle-accidents/">car accident</a>. I also feel for the driver of the Ford. I’m sure he didn’t intend for this accident to happen, certainly not for it to happen the way that it did.</p>
<p>In most situations where car accidents occur in icy or snowy weather, it is because the driver is driving too fast for conditions or has faulty equipment, such as tires that are not in good condition to do well on snowy or icy roads. Although people like to blame God for crashes like this, the fact is that almost all of these crashes are because of human error. We hear this same thing from the UHP: that motorists are driving too fast for conditions and that they are not keeping enough distance between their car and the one in front of them.</p>
<p>In this case, I definitely see a claim against the driver of the Ford and possibly a claim against the driver and/or company of the semi-truck (although the crash may simply have been unavoidable). The family may also make a claim on the “under-insured” policy that was on the Toyota. (In situations like this, claims are almost always made against the insurance companies that insure these vehicles.) I would recommend that the family talk to a Utah accident/injury attorney that focuses on car accident cases to explore the legal remedies that may be available to them.</p>
<p>Published by: Ron Kramer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/01/spanish-fork-car-accident-claims-life-of-21-year-old.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drunk Driver Causes Accident in Layton</title>
		<link>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/01/drunk-driver-causes-accident-in-layton.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/01/drunk-driver-causes-accident-in-layton.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronkramerlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dog Bites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drunk Driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedestrian Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicle Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpartners.info/utl/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Around 10:30 p.m. on January 3, 2009, at the intersection of Antelope Drive and Fairfield Road in Layton, a drunk driver driving a Dodge Durango rear-ended a marked Layton police car. According to the Deseret News, the driver rear ended this police car a total of three times. It’s funny that the reporter says that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Around 10:30 p.m. on January 3, 2009, at the intersection of Antelope Drive and Fairfield Road in Layton, a drunk driver driving a Dodge Durango rear-ended a marked Layton police car. According to the Deseret News, the driver rear ended this police car a total of three times. It’s funny that the reporter says that the driver of the Durango is a “suspected drunken driver.” Honestly, anyone who rear-ends a police car three times has to be hopped on something!</p>
<p>After the <a href="http://ronkramerlaw.com/vehicle-accidents/">crash</a>, a Davis County Sheriff’s deputy was called out to do an investigation. (It is protocol for another law enforcement agency to investigate claims that involved one of their officer’s or their vehicle.) During the investigation, the driver of the Durango left the scene. At first, the deputy attempted to pursue the driver but gave up due to bad road conditions. No matter, the drunk was found a short time later after he struck another vehicle on Antelope Drive, injuring four persons inside that car. The drunk then left his car and made a run for it. Officers eventually caught up with him. He resisted arrest, going so far as to try and fight with an officer. He was booked into the Davis County Jail on a slew of charges.</p>
<p>Although the media and other special interest groups are vigilant in getting out the word that we should not drink and drive, people continue to do it anyway. When they do drive drunk and they hurt someone, however, they will be held accountable for the injuries that they cause. In this case, the four that are injured — perhaps even the Layton Police officer – have a claim against this drunk driver for injuries they experienced because of his actions. I would recommend they contact a personal injury lawyer with experience in taking drunk driving cases.</p>
<p>Ron Kramer is a personal injury lawyer that regularly represents injured persons lving in the Ogden, Layton area. He is a recipient of a 7-figure jury verdict handed down by an Ogden jury in a car accident case last year.</p>
<p>Published by: Ron Kramer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2009/01/drunk-driver-causes-accident-in-layton.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spinal Cord Injury Victim Receives $23.5 Million Verdict</title>
		<link>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2008/12/spinal-cord-injury-victim-receives-23-5-million-verdict.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2008/12/spinal-cord-injury-victim-receives-23-5-million-verdict.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronkramerlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dog Bites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinal Cord Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trucking Accident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicle Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text messaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpartners.info/utl/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what is being described as the largest traffic accident verdict in Kansas, a jury last week handed down a verdict of $23.5 million in a lawsuit involving the collision of two semi trucks that left one of its victim with a serious spinal cord injury. The amount was later reduced 35 percent by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what is being described as the<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Faccident-law.freeadvice.com%2Ftruck-suv-accidents%2Fkansas_truck_accident.htm&amp;ei=UWawSYyFFYmMsAPktch8&amp;usg=AFQjCNH1md9TW3VXPHuKTXwaF--jbVhT1w&amp;sig2=atuHPjuyMisxN34LSwBl4w"> largest traffic accident verdict in Kansas</a>, a jury last week handed down a verdict of $23.5 million in a lawsuit involving the collision of two semi trucks that left one of its victim with a serious spinal cord injury. The amount was later reduced 35 percent by the judge to reflect the contributory fault of the injured victim, for a net verdict of $15.3 million.</p>
<p>According to the Wichita Eagle, the injured man, Terry Frederick, 56, of Overland Park, KS, was asleep in the sleeper portion of a Yellow Freight truck being driven by his riding partner, Dennis Bottorff. The truck accident happened on U.S. 54 near Tucumcari, NM. At the time, the truck was traveling down the highway, approaching a truck stop. Around this time, a woman, in a Swift semi-trailer, was backing her rig onto the highway. (The woman, it is reported, was under the influence of meth at the time.) Mr. Bottorff was apparently unable to stop in time and rear-ended the rear portion of the Swift truck. Sadly he died at the scene. Terry Frederick, who was in the sleeper cab, received a serious, disabling spinal cord injury.</p>
<p>Because of Terry’s <a href="http://www.ronkramerlaw.com/index.php">severe injuries</a>, he racked up massive amounts of medical bills, some $5 million, according to news reports. The bulk of the jury’s verdict will go to pay back medical providers and care givers who rendered medical treatment and to pay others to provide medical support to him in the future. Kudos to the attorneys who got him this tremendous result. We wish him the best as he continues to adjust to a radically-changed life style that came as a result of the other driver’s (and the trucking company’s) poor choices.</p>
<p>Ron Kramer is a <a href="http://www.ronkramerlaw.com/index.php">Utah personal injury attorney</a> who specializes in vehicle accident cases, including those involving spinal cord injuries. Earlier this year, he obtained a seven-figure jury verdict for a client who had received a spinal cord injury from a motor vehicle accident in Ogden, Utah.</p>
<p>Published by: Ron Kramer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2008/12/spinal-cord-injury-victim-receives-23-5-million-verdict.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vernal Utah Car Accident Leaves One Dead, Two Injured</title>
		<link>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2008/12/vernal-utah-car-accident-leaves-one-dead-two-injured.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2008/12/vernal-utah-car-accident-leaves-one-dead-two-injured.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronkramerlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dog Bites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicle Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text messaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpartners.info/utl/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you drive a Dodge one-ton dually over 100 mph down the road, you better make sure your seat belt is on to reduce your injuries when your truck crashes. Occupants of one such Dodge truck were not so lucky when on December 6, 2008, the driver of the truck, Rebecca Kuhn, lost control on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you drive a Dodge one-ton dually over 100 mph down the road, you better make sure your seat belt is on to reduce your injuries when your truck crashes. Occupants of one such Dodge truck were not so lucky when on December 6, 2008, the driver of the truck, Rebecca Kuhn, lost control on U.S. 191 in Utah around 9:30 at night and rolled the truck multiple times. According to KSL News, all three occupants of the truck, believed not to have buckled up, were ejected from the truck following the crash. All were residents of Grand Junction, Colorado. Rebecca Kuhn, sadly, perished at the scene and Charles Brandon was flown in critical condition to a Salt Lake City, Utah hospital. A third passenger, John Thomas, was taken to Ashley Regional Medical Center in Vernal, Utah, and is said to be in stable condition.</p>
<p>Driving over 100 miles per hour down a desolate stretch of Utah blacktop – at night – is nothing short of reckless. If you’re going to do it, though, please, please buckle your seat belt. In fact, whether you are driving carelessly or not, all drivers should INSIST that all passengers in their car wear their seat belts. It is a driver’s responsibility and it is the law.</p>
<p>Legally speaking, both passengers have a claim on the driver of the truck and/or the insurance policy taken out for the truck. If they have their own insurance, they can make a claim on the “underinsured” portion of it.</p>
<p>We offer our condolences to the family and friends of the deceased and wish the victims in this crash a speedy recovery.</p>
<p>Ron Kramer is a <a href="http://www.ronkramerlaw.com/testimonials.php">Utah personal injury attorney</a> practicing in Salt Lake County as well as state-wide.</p>
<p>Published by: Ron Kramer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2008/12/vernal-utah-car-accident-leaves-one-dead-two-injured.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gary Coleman Creates High Interest In Utah Pedestrian Accident</title>
		<link>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2008/12/gary-coleman-creates-high-interest-in-utah-pedestrian-accident.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2008/12/gary-coleman-creates-high-interest-in-utah-pedestrian-accident.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronkramerlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dog Bites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedestrian Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinal Cord Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text messaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpartners.info/utl/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not often that every detail of a pedestrian injury case is reported as it happens in the press. Such is the case, however, when the case involves famous child actor Gary Coleman. The case stems from an incident that happened in Payson, Utah, in the southern part of Utah County in September of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not often that every detail of a pedestrian injury case is reported as it happens in the press. Such is the case, however, when the case involves famous child actor <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Coleman">Gary Coleman</a>. The case stems from an incident that happened in Payson, Utah, in the southern part of Utah County in September of this year. According to newspaper accounts, local resident Colt Rushton recognized Coleman at an area bowling alley and started taking pictures of him on his camera phone. Police say that Coleman became agitated at the photo taking and Rushton was told that he would have to pay to take any more pictures of him. Rushton declined to pay and was outside attempting to take pictures of Coleman as Coleman exited the <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.dctobc.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/gary-coleman.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 141px; height: 181px;" src="http://www.dctobc.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/gary-coleman.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>bowling alley. Rushton claims in a lawsuit filed in Utah Country against Coleman that the 4-foot 8-inch actor punched him in the chest and body. (According to booking records on Colt Rushton for charges of burglary and possession of a controlled substance, Rushton is 5-foot 9-inches.) Rushton further alleges that his cell phone was taken by Coleman’s wife Shannon Price-Coleman.</p>
<p>What happens next is a little unclear. According to an account of a friend of Coleman’s given to eonline.com, Coleman was backing up his truck when Rushton came behind it and was knocked over. Rushton wasn’t the only one hit as Coleman’s truck also hit another vehicle as it was leaving the parking lot. Rushton was reported to have been taken to an area hospital and treated for minor injuries. Mr. Coleman’s attorney, Randy Kester, maintains that “Mr. Coleman did nothing wrong.” Kester told People.com that “It was Mr. Rushton who provoked this incident. My client was simply trying to leave the bowling alley.”</p>
<p style="border: 0pt none ; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; outline-color: -moz-use-text-color; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0pt;" id="kslvid4198739">
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://pandora.bonnint.net/video/embed-p.php?id=4198739"></script>
<p style="border: 0pt none ; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; outline-color: -moz-use-text-color; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0pt; vertical-align: baseline; font-size: 0.75em; text-align: center; width: 424px;">Video Courtesy of <a href="http://www.ksl.com/">KSL.com</a></p>
<p>Despite his plea of innocence, however, Gary Coleman pleaded no contest on December 2, 2008, to charges of reckless driving and disorderly conduct. Under the plea deal, these charges will be dropped in 9-month’s time if Coleman keeps his nose clean. Coleman told KSL.com that he took a plea deal because he wanted to get the case over with.</p>
<p>In the meantime, the personal injury lawsuit filed by Utah attorney Dustin Lance against Gary Coleman continues forward. In these types of auto accident cases, the insurance company for the alleged at-fault driver will hire <a href="http://www.ronkramerlaw.com/index.php">attorneys to defend the action</a>. I would expect the insurance company attorneys for Coleman in this case to allege that Rushton bears a good chuck of the responsibility for his injuries because he put himself behind the backing vehicle. Attorneys will probably also argue that if he was concerned that his phone was being stolen, he could have noted the license number of the truck and reported it to the police.</p>
<p>Injuries in this case also appear to be on the light side as far as personal injury cases go. If all Rushton had was a visit to the ER, you would not expect to see a lawsuit filed in such a case. Practically speaking, it would not be worth anyone’s time or money to let a low-injury personal injury case churn in the court docket for an expected 18-24 months. Rather, in a Utah pedestrian accident case, you would expect a settlement with the at-fault insurance company. That is, of course, unless they denied responsibility for the incident. Rushton’s criminal history may also prove problematic to his case at trial, especially if he has been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty or moral turpitude, such as burglary. Such a conviction can be used to impeach or discredit the story that Rushton may offer at trial. If he has any felonies on his record in the past 10 years, those likely will also come in at trial to his detriment.</p>
<p>One thing is clear, this is definitely an interesting case that we will continue to follow and comment on as it develops. See the <a href="http://www.utahcountyonline.org/Dept/Sheriff/InmateDetail.asp?id=219722">criminal records source</a>.</p>
<p>Published by: Ron Kramer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2008/12/gary-coleman-creates-high-interest-in-utah-pedestrian-accident.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dog Bite to Police Dog Results in 3rd Degree Felony Charge</title>
		<link>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2008/11/dog-bite-to-police-dog-results-in-3rd-degree-felony-charge.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2008/11/dog-bite-to-police-dog-results-in-3rd-degree-felony-charge.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronkramerlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dog Bites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadpartners.info/utl/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pit bull dog owner is in hot water after his dog attacked and bit a K9 service animal. The dog owner, William Knowlton, is charged with a 3rd degree felony for letting his pit bull escape and injure a police dog. The officers were on Knowlton’s doorstep originally because of an alleged protective order [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="https://secure.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,705265687,00.html">pit bull dog owner is in hot water after his dog attacked </a>and bit a K9 service animal. The dog owner, William Knowlton, is charged with a 3rd degree felony for letting his pit bull escape and injure a police dog. The officers were on Knowlton’s doorstep originally because of an alleged protective order violation. According to the Deseret News, prosecutors alleged that Knowlton opened up his door and let his pit bull escape. Once out, it locked its jaw just above the other dog’s left eye. At one point, one of the officers drew his gun, ready to shoot the pit bull. Knowlton at that time stepped between the officer and the dog, but didn’t call off the dog.. Police then used a Taser on the dog to get him to remove his grip. The pit bull has not been found and is believed to be at large.</p>
<p>In Utah, a dog owner is “strictly liable” for injuries that their dogs cause another (person). Unlike some other states, Utah does not follow the “one free bite” rule. Dog owners are therefore expected to be vigilant and to make sure that their animals do not injure others. Because if they do injure someone, they are responsible.</p>
<p>Ron Kramer is a <a href="http://www.ronkramerlaw.com/dog-bites.php">Utah dog bite, personal injury attorney</a>, regularly practicing in the <a href="http://www.ronkramerlaw.com/contact.php">Ogden, Salt Lake and Provo</a> areas.</p>
<p>Published by: Ron Kramer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.utahlawtalk.com/2008/11/dog-bite-to-police-dog-results-in-3rd-degree-felony-charge.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
