Archive for the ‘Legal News’ Category

Tooele Attorney Dismisses Charges in UPS Car Accident Case

Wednesday, January 28th, 2009

Charges filed against the driver of a dump truck that made a left-hand turn in front of UPS driver Alan Christofferson resulting in a fatal car accident in Tooele, Utah, are being dropped. According to KSL news, the Tooele County attorney’s office says there was “human error” at the crime lab in testing the driver’s blood. In fact, a retest showed “triple zeros” for the dump truck driver Steven Jakeman. We are told that charges of failure to yield and failure to provide a valid license will still be made.

Video Courtesy of KSL.com

I’m glad that the Tooele County Attorney’s office brought this information to light. The driver, whose actions led to this Tooele truck accident, obviously shouldn’t have to face an added penalty based on false evidence. Yet he should still be held accountable for the consequences of his actions.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Sandy Car Accident Causes Power Outage

Monday, January 26th, 2009

Last night, January 25, 2009, a car spun out of control on an icy road and hit a power pole near 1300 East and 9100 South in Sandy, Utah. The crash severed wires and disrupted power to about 7300 residents for around two hours. Interestingly, a Sandy City Police Dept. squad car somehow got tangled up in the wires and had to wait until rescue crews could get him out. There is no word on the condition of the person who hit the pole. Obviously, they have no legal claim in this situation since from the sound of it, they were driving too fast for conditions.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Mine Safety Ruling Clears Way for Employee’s Suit

Friday, January 23rd, 2009

On October 29, 2008, William L. Kay, 81 years of age, was an employee of Bob Orton Trucking of Panguitch, and on the day in question, was delivering a load of pipes to a job site at Kennecott Utah Copper Corp. Another tailings pond contractor, Ames Construction, was involved in helping to unload the pipes. Although it is somewhat unclear, it appears that straps that held the pipes were unloosed before a forklift could be positioned in place to catch them. A 3,000 pound pipe then fell off the truck an on to Mr. Kay, crushing him to death. Now the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration is blaming both Bob Orton Trucking and Ames Construction for this fatal accident, saying that they violated policies put in place for safe unloading. Both of these companies were cited by the MSHA.

Now normally if an employee is injured when they are on the clock and another employee or the employee themselves is to blame, then it will be a workers compensation case. In these situations, you cannot sue the employer. However, in Utah if a “third-party” can be blamed for the work place accident, then the worker, or the worker’s family in this case, can bring a civil action against the at-fault person or company. In Utah a “wrongful death heir” is either the parents, the spouse, or children of the injured or killed worker. Thus, the door is now opened for Mr. Kay’s family members to bring a claim against Ames Construction. (They incidently could have brought a claim before, but an administrative determination of fault should be very useful in helping the family establish their claim.) I would recommend that the family contact a Utah personal injury attorney that has experience in handling wrongful death cases to help.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Utah Cell Phone Legislation Worries Snow Plow Operators

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

Law makers concerned with the rising rate of Utah car accidents involving the use of cell phones or text messaging, are proposing legislation this session to set restrictions on cell phone/texting use. In an interesting development, The Utah Dept. Of Transportation says that cell phone driving restrictions will hurt their snow plowing efforts. The legislator who has proposed the bill, Rep. Phil Riesen, is proposing to make the use of a wireless device while driving a class C misdemeanor. But, others in UDOT say that drivers already use two-way radios to communicate. It appears that UDOT’s big concern is that their 2-way radios may somehow be classified as a “wireless device.”

UDOT director is not so sure that a cell phone/text messaging bill would pass in the first place. He says that “most legislators driver around with Blackberries all the time, using them while they drive.”

Published by: Ron Kramer

Skier’s Death Sheds Light on Dangers of Tree Wells

Monday, January 19th, 2009

A skiing accident last week in Utah involving Bountiful, Utah teenager Megan Pysnak, is helping shed some light on the dangers prevalent in ski resorts where there has been a sizeable amount of snowfall. According to KSL news, Megan became separated from her family while skiing at Alta ski resort and was found face down in a tree well. It is well known among skiing professionals that tree wells can be quite dangerous in the winter when there has been a large amount of snow fall.

What happens is that the lower branches of a tree prevent snow from falling into and packing around the base of a tree. Some trees actually have hollow voids with no snow or very loosely-packed, powdery snow around the bottom portion of the exposed tree trunk. As a result, if a skier or snowboarder gets too close to the tree, they can actually get sucked into the well area, and by accounts, usually falling head-first into the area. The light, uncompacted snow causes them to plunge toward the bottom of the tree well. Loose snow then fills in around the victim’s face as they slip downward or struggle, causing those caught in this situation to literally suffocate to death. And since many fall in with their skis or snowboard still attached to their feet, getting out of this situation is said to be close to impossible. Depending on the size of the tree well, other passers by may never actually detect that someone has been swallowed up by a tree.

To reduce the risk of suffering a tree well death or injury, experts advise against skiing too close to pine trees, especially those where the branches appear to be touching the ground. Stick to groomed areas where machinery and skiers have helped to compact the snow. Skiing with a buddy is also recommended. I would also add that an electronic avalanche tracker could help in a situation like this.

I would finally add that the ski resorts themselves can do a much better job at educating their paying customers of the risks involved with skiing near trees. I think way too little is said on this subject. And although the article does not mention if Ms. Pysnak was skiing in an “out-of-bounds” or in a designated area, I would say the resort should still be providing education to their customers of tree well dangers. Anyone who has gone up the lifts of any given ski resort can see the tracks where others have skied through trees outside of the normal ski path of most skiers. In a sense, then, all areas of a ski resort are “designated” unless marked as “out-of-bounds.” As such, skiiers run the risk of suffering the same fate.

I would recommend the family contact an attorney who is versed in ski injury law to advise them and look into how this tragic ski accident happened and how it could have been prevented. If anything, I hope that news of what should have been a preventable injury will help educate and inform others of additional safeguards to take while out skiing.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Agency Aims to Reduce Text Messaging, Cell Phone Car Accidents

Friday, January 16th, 2009

The National Safety Council or NSC has issued a call to motorists, businesses and lawmakers throughout the 50 states to ban the use of cell phones and text messaging devices while motorists’ cars are in motion. A report by the Harvard Center of Risk Analysis says that around 636,000 car accidents happen every year from drivers who talk on their cell phone or who text. Of these auto accidents, around 2,600 involve fatalities and 330,000 involve injuries. “Studies show that driving while talking on a cell phone is extremely dangerous and puts drivers at a four times greater risk of a crash,” said Janet Froetscher, president and CEO of the NSC. “Driving drunk is also dangerous and against the law. When our friends have been drinking, we take the car keys away. It’s time to take the cell phone away.”

There has been recent legislative proposals in Utah that call for the use of hands-free devices while driving. The NSC, however, takes issue with whether these devices actually make driving while on the phone safer than simply putting the phone to the ear. In fact, the NSC cites to our own University of Utah study where researchers showed that talking on one of the many hands-free devices is actually not any safer than talking on a hand-held cell phone. Certainly this study calls into question the effectiveness of pending legislation where hands-free only cell devices are endorsed as a solution to the growing epidemic of cell phone-related Utah car accidents.

The NSC call to action also focuses on things that businesses can do to stem cell and text messaging accidents. It would seem that businesses would be very interested in this proposal since they stand to face big liability issues once the fact finder discovers that their employee was talking on their cell phone or text messaging on company time. Those business that never imposed limitations on cell phone use while driving will be the hardest hit since it is now widely accepted that cell phone and texting while driving can be a huge distraction.

NSC president commented: “Anyone with a busy job knows the temptation to multi-task and stay in touch with the office while driving, believe me, I’ve been there. I didn’t realize how much risk I was taking. Most people don’t. Employers understand how dangerous the behavior is and their potential liability. We are asking all businesses to join us by adopting policies banning calling and texting while driving on the job.”

According to studies by the Insurance Information Institute, a motorists’ ability to operate a vehicle safely is seriously compromised when that motorist is sending or reading a text message or is using their cell phone since motorists not only take their eyes off the road but get intensely involved in their conversations such that they cannot concentrate on the road. A recent survey by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. shows the magnitude of the problem: 73% of the participants in the study talk on their cell phones while driving.

Text messaging accidents has also become a big problem, especially among teen-aged drivers, since you are combining the inexperience of youth with the highly-distracting activity of text messaging. Nationwide Insurance in their study of January of 2007 found that 19% of motorists admitted to texting while driving. But that was two years ago. I’m sure the percentage is much higher now. Since then, we have learned that Salt Lake is tied for second place in the nation for number of text messages sent and received. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety have said that motorists who talk and text while driving are four times more likely to becoming involved in a Utah car accident with injuries than motorists who don’t use these devices.

I do know that in my office we are seeing an increase in the number of Utah car accidents caused by cell phone and/or text messaging use. This includes one of our current clients who was seriously injured when a motorist blew through a red light and hit my client’s car as he was driving through an intersection. This caused his car to spin out of control and strike a pedestrian who was getting ready to cross the street and who was unable to get out of the way quick enough. The woman admitted to police that she had been texting at the time she ran the red light.

Published by: Ron Kramer

New Cell Phone Legislation Aims to Reduce Utah Car Accidents

Friday, January 16th, 2009

On capital hill in Salt Lake City, Utah, lawmakers are debating new proposals to reduce the number of motorists who text message or use their cell phones while driving. According to KSL News, lawmakers say they are tired of hearing about drivers who drive while they are distracted. One proposal by Rep. Paul Ray of Clinton would ban texting while driving and while in parking lots and school zones. Another proposal by Rep. Phil Riesen of Salt Lake would prohibit both text messaging while cell phone use while driving. A violation of this law would be a class-C misdemeanor with possible jail time.

Yet another proposal, and probably the least restrictive, is proposed by Rep. Carol Spackman Moss of Holladay. She proposes that only hands-free devices can be used while driving. This would most likely eliminate texting since it is hard to text without using fingers.

I think these legislative proposals will provide a good start for a discussion on how to reduce the distractions that cell phone use and text messaging can cause. Currently, using a cell phone while driving is mostly allowed in cities in Utah. A few, however, have laws restricting cell phone use to hands-free devices. As far as texting goes, there are no laws the flat out prohibit it. There are laws, however, that make it a secondary offense if the at-fault motorist causes a car accident while text messaging or talking on their cell phones.

Ron Kramer is a personal injury attorney with offices in Draper, Utah and Provo, Utah (coming) who represents those injured by distracted motorists who were text messaging and talking on their cell phones at the time of a car accident.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Utah Car Accident Life Saver: Seatbelts

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

Last year in Utah, 270 people died in Utah car accidents. According to KSL News, most are said to have died because they didn’t have their seatbelt on. In fact, the UHP figures that 110 died for the reason that they didn’t have their seat belt on. This cause of death dwarfed other reasons for fatalities, such as excessive speed, fatigue, DUI or other distractions. Simply buckling your seatbelt is said to be the number one thing you can do to preserve your life while driving.

Of course, it is against the law in Utah to not wear a seatbelt while driving or while riding as a passenger as a vehicle. And as a driver of a vehicle, it is the driver’s duty to make sure their passengers are properly buckled, especially children.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Utah Aims to Reduce Sardine Canyon Accident Rate With Cement Barriers

Sunday, January 11th, 2009

In an effort to reduce the motor vehicle accident rate in Sardine Canyon, Utah, the Utah Dept. Of Transportation will begin to install concrete barriers between mile maker 7.5 and 9.5. According to KSL News, the work is expected to be completed by June 2009. Every year, there are at least 100 car accidents in the Sardine Canyon area. A small percentage of these are fatal car accidents. Just last month, three people died when a driver that had fallen asleep crossed over and ran head on into a Jeep Cherokee carrying two adults and three children. UDOT aims to reduce fatalities such as these in an area that some consider the most dangerous stretch of Sardine Canyon. “Crashing into a barrier and bouncing back out into a lane of traffic is a lot better than crossing over and hitting a semi truck or another vehicle,” said UDOT’s Vic Saunders.

Still, officials stress that while the barriers are designed to reduce the most injuring and deadly of the many car accidents that happen during the year, that they still rely on drivers to make safe driving choices. Along with barriers, I think they should consider speed signs in the more dangerous areas that tell motorists how fast they are going compared to the speed limit in the area. A mandatory lights-on policy could also help to make the highway safer.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Spanish Fork Car Accident Claims Life of 21-Year Old

Thursday, January 8th, 2009

A man is dead after losing control on an icy patch of I-15 in Spanish Fork. According to KSL News, the man, 21 year old Bryce Christensen, was traveling north on I-15 on January 7, 2009 around 8 a.m. when the back of his Toyota RAV4 was struck by a Ford SUV. The driver of the Ford had actually lost control of his or her vehicle after hitting a patch of ice. This all happened when the Ford driver was attempting to merge onto northbound I-15 from Route 6. After the impact occurred, Christensen’s vehicle careened into the median wall and bounced back into the main lanes of travel to be then broadsided by a semi truck. Bryce Christensen was taken to Utah Valley Regional Medical Center, but unfortunately, died a few hours later. A citation is pending against the driver of the Ford.

My condolences to the family of this man. It sounds like he was driving prudently in one of the right lanes when this all happened. From the facts of the story, I can’t see that Mr. Christensen contributed in anyway to the car accident. I also feel for the driver of the Ford. I’m sure he didn’t intend for this accident to happen, certainly not for it to happen the way that it did.

In most situations where car accidents occur in icy or snowy weather, it is because the driver is driving too fast for conditions or has faulty equipment, such as tires that are not in good condition to do well on snowy or icy roads. Although people like to blame God for crashes like this, the fact is that almost all of these crashes are because of human error. We hear this same thing from the UHP: that motorists are driving too fast for conditions and that they are not keeping enough distance between their car and the one in front of them.

In this case, I definitely see a claim against the driver of the Ford and possibly a claim against the driver and/or company of the semi-truck (although the crash may simply have been unavoidable). The family may also make a claim on the “under-insured” policy that was on the Toyota. (In situations like this, claims are almost always made against the insurance companies that insure these vehicles.) I would recommend that the family talk to a Utah accident/injury attorney that focuses on car accident cases to explore the legal remedies that may be available to them.

Published by: Ron Kramer