Archive for the ‘text messaging’ Category

Train Crash Text Messaging Lawsuit Filed in California

Wednesday, December 31st, 2008

We have talked about the dangers of text messaging while driving and have discussed the tragic train crash in California where 25 died when a train engineer became so distracted with sending and receiving text messages that he missed a red light signal and crashed head on into a freight train. Now we learn that a lawsuit has been filed by a Simi Valley mother who lost her son in this terrible train crash.

The lawsuit has been filed against the company that employed the Metrolink engineer. Investigators with the National Transportation Safety Board have said that the engineer sent and received dozens of text messages while on duty the day of the crash, including one he received just 22 seconds before the crash happened. Lawyers who filed the suit on behalf of this mother, are seeking “recovery of compensation for personal property damage and personal injuries.”

Obviously, the engineer was at fault in failing to pay attention to his job duties. His employer, who had no rules against text messaging or other like distractions, is also at fault for allowing this to happen. We will keep you up to date on this case as we learn more information.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Spinal Cord Injury Victim Receives $23.5 Million Verdict

Tuesday, December 9th, 2008

In what is being described as the largest traffic accident verdict in Kansas, a jury last week handed down a verdict of $23.5 million in a lawsuit involving the collision of two semi trucks that left one of its victim with a serious spinal cord injury. The amount was later reduced 35 percent by the judge to reflect the contributory fault of the injured victim, for a net verdict of $15.3 million.

According to the Wichita Eagle, the injured man, Terry Frederick, 56, of Overland Park, KS, was asleep in the sleeper portion of a Yellow Freight truck being driven by his riding partner, Dennis Bottorff. The truck accident happened on U.S. 54 near Tucumcari, NM. At the time, the truck was traveling down the highway, approaching a truck stop. Around this time, a woman, in a Swift semi-trailer, was backing her rig onto the highway. (The woman, it is reported, was under the influence of meth at the time.) Mr. Bottorff was apparently unable to stop in time and rear-ended the rear portion of the Swift truck. Sadly he died at the scene. Terry Frederick, who was in the sleeper cab, received a serious, disabling spinal cord injury.

Because of Terry’s severe injuries, he racked up massive amounts of medical bills, some $5 million, according to news reports. The bulk of the jury’s verdict will go to pay back medical providers and care givers who rendered medical treatment and to pay others to provide medical support to him in the future. Kudos to the attorneys who got him this tremendous result. We wish him the best as he continues to adjust to a radically-changed life style that came as a result of the other driver’s (and the trucking company’s) poor choices.

Ron Kramer is a Utah personal injury attorney who specializes in vehicle accident cases, including those involving spinal cord injuries. Earlier this year, he obtained a seven-figure jury verdict for a client who had received a spinal cord injury from a motor vehicle accident in Ogden, Utah.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Vernal Utah Car Accident Leaves One Dead, Two Injured

Monday, December 8th, 2008

When you drive a Dodge one-ton dually over 100 mph down the road, you better make sure your seat belt is on to reduce your injuries when your truck crashes. Occupants of one such Dodge truck were not so lucky when on December 6, 2008, the driver of the truck, Rebecca Kuhn, lost control on U.S. 191 in Utah around 9:30 at night and rolled the truck multiple times. According to KSL News, all three occupants of the truck, believed not to have buckled up, were ejected from the truck following the crash. All were residents of Grand Junction, Colorado. Rebecca Kuhn, sadly, perished at the scene and Charles Brandon was flown in critical condition to a Salt Lake City, Utah hospital. A third passenger, John Thomas, was taken to Ashley Regional Medical Center in Vernal, Utah, and is said to be in stable condition.

Driving over 100 miles per hour down a desolate stretch of Utah blacktop – at night – is nothing short of reckless. If you’re going to do it, though, please, please buckle your seat belt. In fact, whether you are driving carelessly or not, all drivers should INSIST that all passengers in their car wear their seat belts. It is a driver’s responsibility and it is the law.

Legally speaking, both passengers have a claim on the driver of the truck and/or the insurance policy taken out for the truck. If they have their own insurance, they can make a claim on the “underinsured” portion of it.

We offer our condolences to the family and friends of the deceased and wish the victims in this crash a speedy recovery.

Ron Kramer is a Utah personal injury attorney practicing in Salt Lake County as well as state-wide.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Gary Coleman Creates High Interest In Utah Pedestrian Accident

Tuesday, December 2nd, 2008

It is not often that every detail of a pedestrian injury case is reported as it happens in the press. Such is the case, however, when the case involves famous child actor Gary Coleman. The case stems from an incident that happened in Payson, Utah, in the southern part of Utah County in September of this year. According to newspaper accounts, local resident Colt Rushton recognized Coleman at an area bowling alley and started taking pictures of him on his camera phone. Police say that Coleman became agitated at the photo taking and Rushton was told that he would have to pay to take any more pictures of him. Rushton declined to pay and was outside attempting to take pictures of Coleman as Coleman exited the bowling alley. Rushton claims in a lawsuit filed in Utah Country against Coleman that the 4-foot 8-inch actor punched him in the chest and body. (According to booking records on Colt Rushton for charges of burglary and possession of a controlled substance, Rushton is 5-foot 9-inches.) Rushton further alleges that his cell phone was taken by Coleman’s wife Shannon Price-Coleman.

What happens next is a little unclear. According to an account of a friend of Coleman’s given to eonline.com, Coleman was backing up his truck when Rushton came behind it and was knocked over. Rushton wasn’t the only one hit as Coleman’s truck also hit another vehicle as it was leaving the parking lot. Rushton was reported to have been taken to an area hospital and treated for minor injuries. Mr. Coleman’s attorney, Randy Kester, maintains that “Mr. Coleman did nothing wrong.” Kester told People.com that “It was Mr. Rushton who provoked this incident. My client was simply trying to leave the bowling alley.”

Video Courtesy of KSL.com

Despite his plea of innocence, however, Gary Coleman pleaded no contest on December 2, 2008, to charges of reckless driving and disorderly conduct. Under the plea deal, these charges will be dropped in 9-month’s time if Coleman keeps his nose clean. Coleman told KSL.com that he took a plea deal because he wanted to get the case over with.

In the meantime, the personal injury lawsuit filed by Utah attorney Dustin Lance against Gary Coleman continues forward. In these types of auto accident cases, the insurance company for the alleged at-fault driver will hire attorneys to defend the action. I would expect the insurance company attorneys for Coleman in this case to allege that Rushton bears a good chuck of the responsibility for his injuries because he put himself behind the backing vehicle. Attorneys will probably also argue that if he was concerned that his phone was being stolen, he could have noted the license number of the truck and reported it to the police.

Injuries in this case also appear to be on the light side as far as personal injury cases go. If all Rushton had was a visit to the ER, you would not expect to see a lawsuit filed in such a case. Practically speaking, it would not be worth anyone’s time or money to let a low-injury personal injury case churn in the court docket for an expected 18-24 months. Rather, in a Utah pedestrian accident case, you would expect a settlement with the at-fault insurance company. That is, of course, unless they denied responsibility for the incident. Rushton’s criminal history may also prove problematic to his case at trial, especially if he has been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty or moral turpitude, such as burglary. Such a conviction can be used to impeach or discredit the story that Rushton may offer at trial. If he has any felonies on his record in the past 10 years, those likely will also come in at trial to his detriment.

One thing is clear, this is definitely an interesting case that we will continue to follow and comment on as it develops. See the criminal records source.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Text Messaging in Salt Lake City Among Highest in Nation

Tuesday, November 25th, 2008

A recent study shows that Salt Lake City is tied for second place for the number of text messages sent. Salt Lake tied with Dallas and Memphis for high texting rates. The “winner” overall was El Paso, TX. According to a story in KSL.com, the research firm Scarborough Research found that more than half of Salt Lake residents use their phone for text messaging and that the bulk of those texting are younger. Only 7 percent of Salt Lake’s cell phone users access the internet with their phones.

People commenting on this article wrote about the obvious: that high texting rates can lead to high distraction rate for Salt Lake drivers who text while driving, thereby leading to car accidents. Currently, there is no law in Utah, or Salt Lake City for that matter, that forbids texting while driving. While Utah Code Annotated 41-6a-1715 prohibits “careless driving,” a person will only be guilty of this ordinance if they first commit a moving violation in conjunction with using their cell phone or texting device. In other words, the law says you can text all you want while driving, you just can’t cause a car accident while doing so. This is a little backward, in my opinion.

While assorted Utah cities have laws that require cell phone users to use a hands-free device when talking on their phone, no city has enacted any law that bans text messaging while driving. Other progressive states, such as California, recently enacted such a law. Effective January 1, 2009, the California law prohibits drivers from reading, writing or sending text messages while operating a motor vehicle. First-time offenders in California will face a $20 fine with subsequent fines going up to $50. Gov. Schwarzenegger, in signing the law, said in a statement: “Banning electronic text messaging while driving will keep drivers’ hands on the wheel and their eyes on the road, making our roadways a safer place for all Californians.”

Ron Kramer is a Utah personal injury lawyer who primarily represents those injured in car accidents due to the carelessness of others, including those who cause accidents while text messaging or using their cell phones. He can be reached at 801-553-8838.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Utah Bus Drivers Should Hang Up and Drive

Monday, November 10th, 2008

This is a follow-up blog to the one I posted yesterday about the Utah State Board of Education “looking in to” cell phones and text messaging by its bus drivers. I suggested that a ban should be a “no brainer” and that the Board doesn’t need to wait until there is a bus accident or serious personal injury before acting decisively to prohibit bus drivers talking on phones or texting while driving. Now, according to KSL, the Board is wondering “if there is a problem” with bus drivers being on cell phones while they are driving and they are asking their administrators to “investigate immediately.”

I think some of the comments to this news story on KSL capture the appropriate public response to this:

One poster, Lowell F., in a comment entitled “this is a no-brainer,” said: “hey bus driver…. you have 40 school age children of ours in your care…. stay off the cell phone and watch the road closely. Or get another carreer like telemarketing. How can there even be any question in a school districts mind as to what the policy should be?”

Another poster, Ben D., in a comment entitled “Oh Brother!!!, said: “This is one of those “Well, DUH” stories that comes along every so often. JUDAS!!! Yes, school bus drivers should not be talking on the phone while on the job, nor should they be texting while they drive. This should be common knowledge, but so many people in today’s world need everything spelled out to them.”

I echo this sentiment. An ounce of prevention is surely worth a pound of cure.

Ron Kramer is a Utah personal injury attorney who represents victims of car accidents who have been injured because of the negligence of those who use a cell phone and/or text message while driving.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Texting While Driving Leads to Deadly Crash.

Friday, October 24th, 2008

Last month we talked about the dangers of text messaging while driving in Utah. After the story was written, we learned of a horrific train crash in California that killed 25 people and injured another 135. What was especially tragic about this was that the crash was caused by the negligence of an inattentive engineer who was distracted because he was sending text messages on his cell phone and failed to stop at at stop signal and ran into a freight train. It is hard to fathom how completely reckless this was. This was a guy who was basically responsible for the safety and well being of hundreds of passengers on the train he was operating, using a device that was absolutely guaranteed to distract him. I expect that there will be a number of lawsuits filed against the railway because of the crash. It’s likely that the claim will allege that the railway failed to have policies in place that prevented its engineers from text messaging or being involved in other distracting activities while operating railway equipment. This tragic crash is yet another reminder of how extremely distracting it can be to drive while texting. Hopefully this incident can be a reminder to motorists in Utah of the dangers of text messaging while driving and the importance of hanging up our phone while on the road to avoid accidents.

Published by: Ron Kramer

Texting While Driving: Don’t Do It!

Wednesday, October 8th, 2008

Just before midnight, one of our clients, Joseph, was driving his minivan down the street in Salt Lake. As he approached an intersection, he saw that he had a green light. Unfortunately, another driver in an SUV, who was sending a text message on her cell phone, was planning to go through the same intersection. Because the other driver was distracted, she did not see that her light was red and smashed into the driver’s side door of Joseph’s door, causing him head and neck injuries. A pedestrian who was waiting to cross the street, saw the whole event unfolding and ran to get out of the way of the now out-of-control cars. Sadly, because of the momentum of Joseph’s van, which was now spinning, the pedestrian was unable to get out of the way and suffered serious back injuries.

It seems we are seeing more and more accidents caused by drivers using cell phones. At first, it was the distraction of taking a call. Now, it’s much worse because of the amount of attention that reading or sending a text message takes. To read a message on a cell phone requires you to take your eyes of the road and focus on the tiny words on the phone’s small screen. To compose a message, you have to actually look at the keyboard or number keys. Either way, reading or sending a message on a cell phone is incredibly distracting. The police who spoke regarding this particular accident advised motorists to actually pull off the road if they want to read or answer a text message. This is the safe way to go. It also makes good common sense.

Right now, there are laws in a large number of Utah cities that ban hand-held cell phone use. Interestingly, however, there are no laws that make it illegal to read or write a text message while driving. But, there are laws that prohibit driving while being distracted. This means that you can still be ticketed and fined for careless driving if your phone use impairs your driving ability. The law defines careless driving as “committing a moving violation, other than speeding, while distracted by use of a hand-held cell phone or other activities not related to driving.”

From a legal standpoint, even though the woman who caused the crash may not have broken any laws banning texting while driving, she clearly was driving while being distracted. And she certainly caused a whole lot of outrage in the community. When this story was on KSL.com, it received over 330 comments. Most of these were from outraged citizens angry at this woman for causing what should have been a completely preventable crash. Unfortunately for this woman, it is the community at large that will sit in judgment of her should this case ever have to go to trial.

Published by: Ron Kramer